Changes in the classroom in the AI Era

Benjamin Jaye and Galyna V. Livshyts, associate professors at Georgia Tech

As the nature of mathematical work evolves rapidly, many of us are asking: how should we prepare our students for successful careers? Which skills will be crucial for mathematicians ten years from now — or one year from now, or even one month from now? We would like to share a few ideas.

As AI becomes increasingly capable of producing mathematical arguments, surveying the literature, and drawing connections between different areas of mathematics, the following skills, among others, are becoming paramount:

  1. The ability to read and analyze mathematical arguments quickly and critically; to absorb new ideas; to distinguish genuine insights from hallucinations; and to spot errors, gaps, and tautologies.
  2. The ability to ask interesting questions, formulate conjectures, judge which directions are worth developing, and identify the tools that might make such developments possible.
  3. The ability to communicate mathematical ideas clearly, both in writing and verbally.

As instructors and mentors, we should place greater emphasis on fostering these skills. Here are several kinds of classroom assignments that seem particularly relevant, especially in graduate and upper undergraduate classes:

  1. Proof-auditing assignments. Students could be given a theorem together with several proposed proofs. They would be asked to decide which proofs are correct, identify the precise errors in the incorrect ones, and repair those arguments whenever possible.
  2. Assignments that cultivate mathematical taste. Students could be introduced to a new mathematical object and asked:
    • What would you like understand about this object? Formulate one or two interesting problems involving it.
    • What known objects, results, or open problems might it be related to?
    • Which tools would you try to use in studying it, and why?    

     3. Assignments in mathematical communication. Students could be given AI-assisted mathematical documents and asked to rewrite them as clear, concise, human-readable expositions. They could also serve as peer reviewers, reading one another’s work and offering constructive feedback. 

     4. In-class presentations. Regular short presentations could help students practice explaining mathematical ideas clearly and responding to questions in real time.

These assignments need not be isolated from one another. After proposing ideas in an in-class quiz of type (2), students could pursue them in a homework assignment, potentially with the help of AI. They would then need to produce a human-readable report as in (3), and present and defend their conclusions in class as in (4).

In short, we should be thinking ten steps ahead about how we teach students, train junior researchers, and conduct research ourselves. We hope these ideas will be useful, and we would be very interested to hear what others are trying in their own classrooms.


Received 14 August 2026.

7 responses to “Changes in the classroom in the AI Era”

  1. AS Avatar

    Great ideas! Perhaps, proof formalization and introductory type theory should also be included in the list.

    1. Galyna Livshyts Avatar

      Yeah, for sure, proof formalization is a big one. Maybe we need to run informal groups on that. In fact, it is plausible that AI and lean will get integrated so well that the only thing needed will be to type a proof idea into a window and get a verified formalized theorem back. In which case the skill (1) will in fact be unnecessary too. Only asking right high level questions will matter. On the other hand… AI is good at that too.

  2. Marcin Kotowski Avatar

    Shouldn’t this post better be phrased as a list of skills that should be deemphasized? Which ones?

    1. Galyna Livshyts Avatar

      Hard to say… The issue is that what will be required is all the current skills, plus much more. It’s not like the skill of problem solving or basic logical argument building will not be important. But many new skills will be important too. If Pythagorus saw the way of work of modern mathematicians (or mathematicians five years ago), he would say “you guys this is too hard. I cannot keep up with all this enormous amount of information and I do not have all these skills. I d rather go back to drawing shapes on the sand”. Maybe I exaggerate about shape drawing, but you get what I mean. So now in a short period of time we are making a jump similar in magnitude to that Pythagorus-to-21 century transition. It’s tough. Mathematics will need much more skill and knowledge.

  3. WF Avatar
    WF

    When I was a student, I would have found it extremely insulting to be asked to read and critique AI generated slop. I would have flatly refused to do so, and maybe changed my major. We owe our students thoughtfully curated mathematics, selected to enlighten them and expose them to the best ideas from the mathematical canon. Directing our teaching practices based on vibes and technological fashions will never be sound pedagogy.

    1. AS Avatar

      << "We owe our students thoughtfully curated mathematics, selected to enlighten them and expose them to the best ideas from the mathematical canon."

      That is precisely what the assignments of types (1) and (2) are for. Assignments that cultivate mathematical taste and improve proof-auditing skills do expose students to thoughtfully curated mathematics from the canon. Wouldn't you agree?

    2. Galyna Livshyts Avatar

      Well, the task from (1) does not need to be an AI slop:)

Comments are moderated. Read our comment policy.

Add to the discussion

New posts by email.

Prefer a feed reader? Subscribe by RSS.

Also on Mathstodon.

Latest comments across the site.

Discover more from Proofs and Prompts

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading