The Platonist view

Uri Bader, Professor at Maryland University and Weizmann Institute

Math exists. We explore it.
We do not invent math. We invent ways of understanding and communicating it. We choose which parts of it to study, and we develop an adequate language for that that suits us, humans. But we explore an objectively existing domain. Empirical fact: our abstract exploration bears fruits also in the physical world. This fact is often used as a retrospect justification, but it is rarely our initial motivation. A common metaphor for math exploration is landscape charting.

Geography exists.
Past cartographers sailed the seas. There was an heroic aspect to their profession. There was an artistic aspect to map drawing. Could they envision satellites and computerized general information systems? Their profession is less romantic now, but our maps are better.

Can we envision how math will be explored in years to come? I believe that we will ever be stunned by its inner beauty and astonished by its interplay with the physical world. This interplay will remain fruitful and relevant to society, perhaps more than ever before, and so also the math community. Yes, we are facing a challenge and we should publicly discuss how to adjust. However, we better stop ranting about progress, rather openly embrace it. We should celebrate new opportunities to better fulfil our mission.


Received 21 August 2026.

2 responses to “The Platonist view”

  1. Morten Krogh Avatar
    Morten Krogh

    Yes, exactly. This is the only reasonable way forward. All knowledge work is changing dramatically. That can be scary, but also exciting. Embracing the new world is the most sensible option.

  2. Uri Bader Avatar
    Uri Bader

    I sent this text over three weeks ago, and a lot has happened before its publication today. My aim in writing it was to share my optimism and excitement with some of my colleagues and students who seem desperately pessimistic. I firmly stand behind it.
    However, I wish to clarify that I am not blinded by this optimism. I am concerned with the development of unsafe technology and with the economic effect of irresponsible adoption, which are enhanced by delegating unmonitored power to private, typically predatorial, entities. These concerns are not particular to math, and we should all face them. I am also concerned with some possible effect on the math culture and community. We should face these too. In fact, we have started to do so and I am optimistic regarding our capability. In the text I deliberately don’t touch the question of how to confront these challenges. Rather, I am looking to the distant future, excited, and I am inviting the reader to join me.

Add to the discussion

New posts by email.

Prefer a feed reader? Subscribe by RSS.

Discover more from Proofs and Prompts

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading